java code 39 generator BITMAP INDEXES in Java

Creator Code39 in Java BITMAP INDEXES

ANSI/AIM Code 39 Creation In Java
Using Barcode creation for Java Control to generate, create Code 39 Extended image in Java applications.
Code-39 Reader In Java
Using Barcode recognizer for Java Control to read, scan read, scan image in Java applications.
Sum(index range scan * 1.4) blocks for 20% scattered rows blocks for 80% packed rows 41 * 1.4 * 2 + 80 + 5.7
Printing UPC - 13 In Java
Using Barcode printer for Java Control to generate, create EAN13 image in Java applications.
PDF417 Drawer In Java
Using Barcode generator for Java Control to generate, create PDF417 image in Java applications.
+ + = = 200.5
Barcode Generation In Java
Using Barcode printer for Java Control to generate, create Barcode image in Java applications.
Painting QR Code JIS X 0510 In Java
Using Barcode generation for Java Control to generate, create QR Code ISO/IEC18004 image in Java applications.
This is a lot closer to our target of 206, and well within the limits of that ever-present variation we get by changing the value of db_file_multiblock_read_count, so I m happy to leave the approximation there, and move on to the other bitmap transformation. The second bitmap transformation is something I ve only come across very recently (in fact, in a question on the AskTom web site, at Like many execution plans in Oracle, it was obvious after I saw it that I should have known that it could happen (a case of 20-20 hindsight ), it was just that I had never expected that it would happen. If Oracle can convert between bitmap entries and rowids, there is no technical reason why it shouldn t do so at any point in an execution plan, so the following execution plan is perfectly legal (see script bitmap_cost_08.sql in the online code suite): select d1, count(*) from t1 where and group by d1 ; Execution Plan ( ---------------------------------------------------------0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=ALL_ROWS (Cost=48 Card=4 Bytes=44) 1 0 SORT (GROUP BY) (Cost=48 Card=4 Bytes=44) 2 1 VIEW OF 'index$_join$_001' (Cost=41 Card=801 Bytes=8811) 3 2 HASH JOIN 4 3 BITMAP CONVERSION (TO ROWIDS) 5 4 BITMAP INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'T1_D1' 6 3 BITMAP CONVERSION (TO ROWIDS) 7 6 BITMAP INDEX (SINGLE VALUE) OF 'T1_N1' Note especially how we start with two bitmap indexes, acquire some leaf block data from each in turn, and then effectively turn the results into an in-memory B-tree index. Once we have two B-tree index sections, we can do an index hash join between them. This example, of course, is exactly the opposite to the previous example, where we started with B-tree indexes, acquired some leaf block data, and converted to in-memory bitmap indexes. As ever, we can put together the stuff we have learned so far to work out how this plan achieves its final cost. And in this case, the bit we are most interested in is the working that gets us to the result of the hash join (the index$_join$_001 view in line 2). n1 = 2 d1 between to_date('&m_today', 'DD-MON-YYYY') and to_date('&m_future','DD-MON-YYYY')
EAN 128 Creator In Java
Using Barcode creator for Java Control to generate, create UCC - 12 image in Java applications.
ISBN Maker In Java
Using Barcode generation for Java Control to generate, create ISBN image in Java applications.
Code 39 Full ASCII Generation In C#
Using Barcode printer for VS .NET Control to generate, create Code 39 Extended image in VS .NET applications.
Code39 Creator In VB.NET
Using Barcode generator for .NET framework Control to generate, create Code 39 Extended image in Visual Studio .NET applications.
Whenever you have to work with problems like this, there are usually several different approaches you could take, and the easiest demonstration of what s going on here is to run the query with the 10053 trace event enabled. When you examine the trace file, you find that Oracle is simply working out the usual index access cost to get at the leaf blocks of the two indexes, with no special scaling factor, and no little extra add-on to allow for the bitmap conversion (to rowids). After that, the cost of the hash join is simply the normal costing for hash joins (which you will see in 12). An alternative strategy to determine that Oracle is simply using the normal index costing is to use dbms_stats.set_index_stats to adjust the index statistics. Add 10 to the blevel of one index, and the total cost of the query goes up by 10; adjust the number of leaf_blocks in an index by an amount that should add 10 to the index cost, and it adds 10 to the total cost of the query.
Draw Barcode In None
Using Barcode creation for Office Word Control to generate, create Barcode image in Microsoft Word applications.
Drawing UPC A In VS .NET
Using Barcode generation for Reporting Service Control to generate, create GS1 - 12 image in Reporting Service applications.
Decoding Code128 In Visual Basic .NET
Using Barcode scanner for .NET Control to read, scan read, scan image in .NET framework applications.
Code 39 Extended Reader In .NET Framework
Using Barcode scanner for .NET framework Control to read, scan read, scan image in VS .NET applications.
Bitmap indexes lose information about data scattering, so the optimizer has to invent some numbers. As soon as the optimizer uses hard-coded constants in place of real information, it is inevitable that some of your queries will do the wrong thing. I am still not sure of the exact formulae used by Oracle for costing bitmap access there may even be bugs in the costing algorithms that make the costing unstable. I think the notes and approximations of this chapter should be sufficient to give you a reasonable idea of how the optimizer is going to behave, but there seems to be a surprising fudge factor that depends on the value of db_file_multiblock_read_count. When you move from traditional costing to CPU costing, you may see some execution plans change dramatically, and others stay largely the same but run more slowly because an extra bitmap index has been used (perhaps unnecessarily) to filter data out. When you combine bitmap indexes, the optimizer seems to report a cost based on the cost of just the cheapest relevant index instead of the cost of the indexes actually used. This has some odd side effects that may mean some queries do too much work because an inappropriate set of indexes has been picked. It is possible that the apparent bugs in the calculations are actually a deliberate design choice that is supposed to incur high numbers of logical I/Os against bitmap indexes to save on small numbers of physical I/Os against tables. In effect, the costing model may be assuming that you have your bitmap indexes in a large KEEP pool and the corresponding tables into a small RECYCLE pool. (Warning: this comment is highly speculative, so don t depend on it.) Keep a close eye on the patch list for any bugs relating to costing of bitmap indexes. Some fixes might have a serious impact on your databases performance.
USS-128 Encoder In Objective-C
Using Barcode maker for iPad Control to generate, create EAN / UCC - 13 image in iPad applications.
Generate DataMatrix In Visual C#
Using Barcode maker for Visual Studio .NET Control to generate, create Data Matrix 2d barcode image in VS .NET applications.
PDF417 Scanner In Visual C#.NET
Using Barcode reader for .NET framework Control to read, scan read, scan image in VS .NET applications.
Code39 Creator In None
Using Barcode creator for Software Control to generate, create Code 39 Extended image in Software applications.
QR-Code Scanner In Java
Using Barcode reader for Java Control to read, scan read, scan image in Java applications.
Creating Code128 In Objective-C
Using Barcode encoder for iPhone Control to generate, create Code 128B image in iPhone applications.
Copyright © . All rights reserved.