Administering and Optimizing a Wireless LAN in Software

Encoding Data Matrix ECC200 in Software Administering and Optimizing a Wireless LAN

Administering and Optimizing a Wireless LAN
Data Matrix 2d Barcode Maker In None
Using Barcode maker for Software Control to generate, create DataMatrix image in Software applications.
Data Matrix 2d Barcode Recognizer In None
Using Barcode decoder for Software Control to read, scan read, scan image in Software applications.
Single MAC model benefits include:
Making Data Matrix In C#
Using Barcode creation for .NET Control to generate, create DataMatrix image in .NET framework applications.
Paint Data Matrix ECC200 In .NET Framework
Using Barcode creator for ASP.NET Control to generate, create Data Matrix ECC200 image in ASP.NET applications.
There is no single point of failure If one AP goes down, the others continue
Creating Data Matrix 2d Barcode In .NET
Using Barcode printer for .NET Control to generate, create Data Matrix image in VS .NET applications.
Data Matrix ECC200 Creator In VB.NET
Using Barcode encoder for .NET framework Control to generate, create Data Matrix ECC200 image in VS .NET applications.
to function
Encoding European Article Number 13 In None
Using Barcode drawer for Software Control to generate, create EAN-13 Supplement 5 image in Software applications.
Draw Barcode In None
Using Barcode generator for Software Control to generate, create bar code image in Software applications.
Less wired network traffic is required to manage the wireless stations More features are included within the APs themselves
Making UCC.EAN - 128 In None
Using Barcode generation for Software Control to generate, create UCC.EAN - 128 image in Software applications.
Printing GS1 - 12 In None
Using Barcode generation for Software Control to generate, create UPC Code image in Software applications.
Centralized management tools can reduce or even eliminate the costs associated with the single MAC model These tools allow you to update firmware, change configurations, and even perform dynamic radio adjustments automatically from a central controller The central device is usually a software application that runs on a server
Making Code 39 In None
Using Barcode generation for Software Control to generate, create USS Code 39 image in Software applications.
Making Data Matrix ECC200 In None
Using Barcode printer for Software Control to generate, create DataMatrix image in Software applications.
Split MAC Model (Centralized)
Drawing USPS OneCode Solution Barcode In None
Using Barcode maker for Software Control to generate, create USPS OneCode Solution Barcode image in Software applications.
Recognize EAN13 In Visual Studio .NET
Using Barcode decoder for VS .NET Control to read, scan read, scan image in .NET applications.
The split MAC model is called such because a portion of the MAC layer operation is offset to centralized controllers and another portion remains in the AP These types of APs are often called thin APs or access ports because they do not perform as many functions as the traditional APs (fat APs or thick APs) The split MAC model is very popular in large networks today and is becoming more popular in smaller networks as well, as newer devices support the split-MAC model while implementing fewer APs There are costs and benefits associated with the split MAC model too Split MAC model costs include:
Generating EAN-13 Supplement 5 In Objective-C
Using Barcode generation for iPhone Control to generate, create GTIN - 13 image in iPhone applications.
UPC Symbol Scanner In .NET
Using Barcode reader for Visual Studio .NET Control to read, scan read, scan image in .NET applications.
A possible single point of failure arises at the WLAN controller Increased wired network traffic is required to manage the wireless stations There are fewer features within the APs themselves when using truly thin APs
Code 39 Full ASCII Creator In Objective-C
Using Barcode creation for iPad Control to generate, create Code 39 Extended image in iPad applications.
Code 128C Recognizer In VB.NET
Using Barcode recognizer for .NET Control to read, scan read, scan image in VS .NET applications.
Split MAC model benefits include:
Data Matrix 2d Barcode Drawer In None
Using Barcode generator for Excel Control to generate, create Data Matrix ECC200 image in Office Excel applications.
Bar Code Creator In Objective-C
Using Barcode drawer for iPhone Control to generate, create barcode image in iPhone applications.
Centralized administration may reduce ongoing support efforts APs may or may not be less expensive, because they can have less memory
and processing power
Each AP may be able to handle more client stations, since the AP doesn t
have to handle management processing overhead You may have noticed that, in a large way, the benefits of the split-MAC model are the costs of the single-MAC model and the benefits of the single-MAC
Procedures for Optimizing Wireless Networks
model are the costs of the split-MAC model While there are certainly more details involved than this, it is important to understand that you will be giving up something regardless of the model you choose The key is to determine what is best suited to fill the organizational and technical needs of the organization in which you are implementing the WLAN
Enterprise Versus Consumer Hardware
Another key decision you must make is that between enterprise-class and consumergrade hardware The differences between these two categories of hardware are important If you attempt to install consumer-grade APs in an environment requiring dozens of APs, you will quickly discover that the lack of centralized management causes tremendous inefficiencies in administration For example, to change one single setting, you will have to connect to every AP individually and configure that setting This method of management is time-consuming and frustrating Table 8-1 provides a comparison of enterprise-class and consumer-grade hardware
Proper Placement
Regardless of the hardware chosen, the hardware must be installed and configured correctly WLAN switches, controllers, encryption gateways, and other such devices will be located in switch closets and network operation centers The APs will be distributed throughput the facility Part of WLAN optimization is determining the best placement of antennas for transmission and reception The initial placement will be determined in the site survey, but changes to the environment may demand changes in antenna placement or orientation An entirely new site survey is not required You can usually just perform coverage validation for those users accessing the AP for which the antenna has been repositioned
TABLE 8-1
Enterprise-Class Hardware
Usually provides centralized configuration Includes more features Provides PoE power May have more powerful hardware Often provides detachable antennas May provide enhanced security features
Consumer-Grade Hardware
Usually requires individual configuration Includes fewer features Does not provide PoE power May have less powerful hardware Often provides detachable antennas Usually provides basic security features
Enterprise Versus Consumer Hardware
8:
Administering and Optimizing a Wireless LAN
SCENARIO & SOLUTION
You have installed a WLAN During the first few months, the users did not complain about the performance of the WLAN Last week, the office manager had several new metal filing cabinets installed Now the users are complaining about weakened signals Should you buy new APs or adjust the antenna locations If the WLAN was performing acceptably before, you should adjust the antenna locations first This action will most likely resolve the performance problem, as small changes can make a big difference in WLAN functionality
One of the solutions to WLAN performance problems is antenna diversity Antenna diversity is discussed in greater detail in a later section of this chapter titled Multipath and Performance ; however, it is sufficient for now to know that antenna diversity uses more than one antenna in order to improve reception or transmission Interestingly, the solution uses only one antenna for actual communications and the two antennas of choice are usually within 5 or 6 inches of each other The fact that the antennas can be so close to one another and still provide very different communication capabilities should serve as a reminder that slight location differences can greatly enhance or depreciate wireless communications
Copyright © OnBarcode.com . All rights reserved.