free barcode generator in vb.net SQL TODAY AND TOMORROW in Software

Generate Code128 in Software SQL TODAY AND TOMORROW

SQL TODAY AND TOMORROW
Code 128 Code Set A Decoder In None
Using Barcode Control SDK for Software Control to generate, create, read, scan barcode image in Software applications.
ANSI/AIM Code 128 Printer In None
Using Barcode generator for Software Control to generate, create Code 128 Code Set B image in Software applications.
SQL: The Complete Reference
Code 128 Recognizer In None
Using Barcode reader for Software Control to read, scan read, scan image in Software applications.
Paint Code 128 In Visual C#.NET
Using Barcode drawer for .NET framework Control to generate, create Code128 image in .NET applications.
< xml version="1.0" > <purchaseOrder> <customerNumber>2117</customerNumber> <orderNumber>112961</orderNumber> <orderDate>1989-12-17</orderDate> <repNumber>106</repNumber> <terms ship="ground" bill="Net30"></terms> <orderItem> <mfr>REI</mfr> <product>2A44L</product> <qty>7</qty> <amount>31500.00</amount> </orderItem> <orderItem> <mfr>ACI</mfr> <product>41003</product> <qty>10</qty> <amount>6520.00</amount> </orderItem> </purchaseOrder> Figure 25-4.
Code 128 Code Set B Creator In .NET
Using Barcode maker for ASP.NET Control to generate, create Code 128B image in ASP.NET applications.
Generate Code128 In Visual Studio .NET
Using Barcode generator for .NET Control to generate, create USS Code 128 image in VS .NET applications.
A slightly expanded XML purchase order document
Creating Code 128 Code Set B In VB.NET
Using Barcode creation for Visual Studio .NET Control to generate, create Code 128A image in .NET applications.
Print UCC - 12 In None
Using Barcode maker for Software Control to generate, create UPCA image in Software applications.
The multiline purchase order merely scratches the surface of marshalling and unmarshalling XML documents. The more general situation is shown in Figure 25-5, where the DBMS must unmarshal an XML document into multiple rows of multiple, interrelated tables. To marshal the document, the DBMS must exercise the relationships between the tables to find the related rows and recompose the XML hierarchy. The underlying reason for this complexity is the mismatch between XML s natural hierarchical structure and the flat, normalized, row/column structure of a relational database. Marshalling and unmarshalling is both simplified and made more complex if a DBMS supports object-relational extensions, such as structured data types. The translation to and from XML can be simpler because individual columns of a table can now have their own hierarchical structure. A higher-level XML element (such as a billing address composed of street, city, state, country, and postal code elements) can be mapped into a corresponding column with an abstract ADDRESS data type, with its own internal hierarchy. However, the translation to and from XML now involves more decisions in the database design, trading off the marshalling/unmarshalling simplicity of structured data types against the flexibility of a flattened row/column approach. Several commercial products are beginning to offer marshalling/unmarshalling capabilities, or have announced plans to provide this capability in future releases. The
Encoding Barcode In None
Using Barcode generation for Software Control to generate, create bar code image in Software applications.
Encoding Code 128 Code Set B In None
Using Barcode generator for Software Control to generate, create Code 128A image in Software applications.
25:
Data Matrix ECC200 Generator In None
Using Barcode printer for Software Control to generate, create Data Matrix ECC200 image in Software applications.
Encoding EAN128 In None
Using Barcode generation for Software Control to generate, create EAN / UCC - 14 image in Software applications.
SQL and XML
EAN / UCC - 8 Drawer In None
Using Barcode encoder for Software Control to generate, create EAN-8 image in Software applications.
Paint Code39 In Java
Using Barcode generator for Android Control to generate, create Code39 image in Android applications.
SQL TODAY AND TOMORROW
Bar Code Reader In .NET
Using Barcode reader for .NET Control to read, scan read, scan image in .NET framework applications.
Print UPC-A Supplement 5 In Java
Using Barcode encoder for Java Control to generate, create GTIN - 12 image in Java applications.
Figure 25-5.
Generate Code 128 Code Set A In Objective-C
Using Barcode printer for iPhone Control to generate, create Code-128 image in iPhone applications.
Reading ECC200 In Java
Using Barcode decoder for Java Control to read, scan read, scan image in Java applications.
XML marshalling and unmarshalling for a database
ECC200 Scanner In None
Using Barcode decoder for Software Control to read, scan read, scan image in Software applications.
Generate Matrix Barcode In Java
Using Barcode drawer for Java Control to generate, create Matrix 2D Barcode image in Java applications.
performance overhead of this translation can be very substantial, and it remains to be seen how popular these capabilities will be in practice. However, if an application is handling external data in XML form, the translation between XML and SQL data must occur at some point, and translation within the DBMS itself may be the most efficient approach.
XML and Metadata
One of the most powerful qualities of the relational model is its very rigid support for data types and data structure, implemented by the definitions of tables, columns, primary keys, foreign keys, and constraints. In addition, as shown in 16, the system catalog of a relational database contains metadata, or data about the data in the database. By querying the system catalog, you can discover the structure of the database, including the data types of its columns, the columns that comprise its tables, and intratable relationships. In contrast, XML documents by themselves provide only very limited metadata. They impose a hierarchical element structure on their data, but the only real data about the structure is the names of the elements and attributes. An XML document can be well formed and still have quite an irregular structure. For example, there is nothing to
SQL: The Complete Reference
prevent a well-formed XML document from having a named element that contains text data in one instance and subelements in another instance, or a named attribute that has an integer value for one element and a date value for another. Clearly, a document with this structure, while it may be well formed, does not represent data that is easily transformed to and from a relational database. When using XML for data processing documents, stronger support for data types and rigid structure is needed. XML standards and products have addressed this need in multiple ways during the short history of XML technologies. These include: I Document Type Definition (DTD). A part of the original XML 1.0 specification, Document Type Definitions provided a way to specify and restrict the structure of a document. XML parsers can examine an XML document in the context of a DTD and determine whether it is a valid document (i.e., whether it conforms to the DTD restrictions). I XML-Data. Submitted to the W3C in 1998, XML-Data was an early attempt to address some of the deficiencies in the DTD scheme. It never received W3C endorsement, but many of its ideas have carried forward into the XML Schema specification. Microsoft adapted its own form of XML-Data, called XML-Data Reduced (XDR), and implemented it as part of its BizTalk integration server and Internet Explorer 5.0 browser. The energy around the XML-Data proposal shifted in late 1999 and 2000 to the XML Schema proposal. I XML Schema. A stand-alone specification that became a W3C recommendation in May 2001, XML Schema built on and extended the ideas in XML-Data. XML Schema provides much more rigorous data type support, and has the advantage that the schema definition (the document metadata) is itself expressed as an XML document, in much the same way that relational database metadata is provided via a standard relational table structure. I Industry group standards. Various industry groups have banded together to define XML standards for specific types of documents that are important for data exchange within their industry. For example, financial services firms are working on standards to describe financial instruments (stocks, bonds, etc.) and market data. Manufacturing firms are working on standards to describe purchase order documents, order confirmations, and the like. These standards for specific industry-oriented documents are usually built on generic standards, such as DTD and XML Schema. The area of XML metadata and document type standards is evolving rapidly. The W3C consortium provides a frequently updated web site at http://www.w3.org, which provides access to the various XML-related standards and information about their status. You can find information about industry-specific standards at http://www.xml.org, a site organized and hosted by the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Systems (OASIS). The site contains a registry of XML-based standards, classified by industry.
25:
Copyright © OnBarcode.com . All rights reserved.